New Cisco Mobile Testing Locations for Routing and Switching

Mobile CCIE Labs provide greater access to take your CCIE Routing & Switching Lab exam

Mobile CCIE Labs are currently only available for CCIE Routing & Switching Lab Exam Candidates
Cisco has introduced the mobile lab program to provide candidates greater access to Lab testing while greatly reducing travel time and expenses. Mobile CCIE Labs provide a convenient and cost-effective method for candidates to test for CCIE Routing and Switching in areas which do not have permanent lab locations.
The Mobile CCIE Lab reduces the need for costly travel, hotel, passport, and visa fees, missed days of work and the need to leave the country to take the CCIE Lab exam.

Scheduled Mobile Lab Location: Scheduled Dates:
Karachi, Pakistan Oct 13-17
Cairo, Egypt Oct 26-30
Istanbul, Turkey Nov 3-7
Johannesburg, South Africa Nov 24-28
Map of Cisco Lab Locations and proposed Mobile Labs Mobility_Map_cropped_640x298.jpg
Proposed Mobile Lab Locations: Proposed Dates:
Seoul, Korea Dec ’08
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Jan‘09
Shanghai, China Jan‘09
Moscow, Russia Jan, Apr, Jul, Sep ‘09
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Mar ‘09
Belgrade, Serbi Mar‘09
Kiev, Ukraine Mar & Apr‘09
Osaka, Japan Apr & Jul‘09
New Delhi, India May ‘09
Jakarta, Indonesia May‘09
Chi Min City, Vietnam Jun ‘09
Johannesburg, South Africa Jun ‘09
Amman, Jordan Aug ‘09
Mexico City, Mexico Aug ‘09
Singapore Aug ‘09
How Do I Get Started?
Contact the Business Development Manager for your region to learn more details about the mobile test labs.
Business Development Manager Region
Gert DeLaet EMEA
Danny Gooris Eastern Europe
Ashok Balakrishnan Southeast Asia
Wang Ying China
Kuniko Oka Japan
Joaquin Lopez Latin America
Reference: https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/docs/DOC-3224
Tags: , , ,
Oct
13
Hello to all our faithful Blog readers! I hope this post finds you well!
I cleared the Written on Saturday, Oct. 11, 2008 and I thought I would give you a quick review of this exam.
Several of my peers have indicated they thought this exam was actually too easy, and I must admit that I would have to agree with them. I know this is all very relative, but the minimum passing score is so low, and so many of the questions very easy and obvious, it was strangely simple to pass. Here are the details:
  • Number of questions: 105
  • Time allowed: 2 hrs
  • Minimum passing score: 57 (Yes – 57!)
  • Multiple choice, drag and drop – No Simulations
By far, the best way to prep for this exam is to study the CCSP curriculum. Just be sure you are studying older versions of the courses. For example, this exam focused on versions 5 and 6 of the PIX/ASA software. The new SNAF course would not be appropriate study materials as it covers version 8.x of the software now I believe.
Taking a look at the blueprint, it is very accurate as far as topic coverage. For example, they give RFC2827 as an RFC example you need to know, and sure enough, you need to know it! ☺ Keep in mind that most of these topics are fully covered in the CCSP curriculum. For the others, I simply used free resources on the Internet, such as wikipedia and RFC sites, to find study materials.
While the blueprint is very accurate, I did find the exam lacking in two areas that the blueprint did have me study – IPV6 Security and Wireless Security. These are two categories in the Cisco Security General section.
Keep in mind that you can go back and re-visit previous questions in this exam. This is important since you will find that some questions actually help answer previous ones.
You also have a review period at the end where you can revisit all the questions, or revisit those you have marked for review.
I found the toughest questions dealt with NAC. This was purely the result of the fact that many of us are not studying NAC yet as it has yet to really show up in the Lab blueprint. It is sure to soon, however.
Best of luck on this exam for those of you yet to clear it. I sure hope this post helped you. I would love to create some training materials for mastery of this exam…let me know if you would be interested. . .

0 comments:

Post a Comment